Mathematics is Not Objectively True

Read this math paper I wrote to understand why mathematics is false and was created with flawed human thinking by certain people over many centuries.

!UPDATE!

Unfortunately, my paper was taken down sometime ago by Google for going against the status quo somehow funny enough. Nobody wants to face the fact that math is subjective and can't exist without a mind. I showed that unequivocally in my argument. I'm looking to maybe upload it back if I can as I haven't done any serious studies in mathematics in well over a year, going on 2 years almost, and will have to surf through my multitude of papers to find it. 

Popular posts from this blog

Debunked: Rebekah Was 3 Years Old When She Married Isaac

Image
Muslims will try very hard to argue for any immoral cases in the Bible to make it look equally as unappealing as their Qur’an so it doesn’t fall to an inferior status. Much like a dysfunctional relationship where you’re the one who’s had enough and wants to let the other go but refuses to let go of you thinking it will still work out. That is the Qur’an to the Bible. The Qur’an wants to share the same status and appreciation as the Bible, but is still unable to rival it to that point. Unfortunately, this is yet another one of those cases where the Qur’an will fall very short of making the Bible look equally unappealing insofar that the Qur’an will look much worse in comparison. It’s the infamous claim about Rebekah’s age of marriage to Isaac which muslims will say was 3. How inaccurate and unsupported by the scriptural evidence this statement is! Here’s why… the Bible does not explicitly say the age of Rebekah when Isaac married her. I will steelman this for the muslims. Muslim arg...
Read more

Why I Don't believe In Evolution and Why You Shouldn't Either

Image
  The problem with the theory of evolution on the macro scale is that it has always been inherently at odds with the way science has been traditionally conducted since the beginning. When it comes to science it’s not about certainty it’s about uncertainty. That’s why there is no such thing as ‘proof’ in scientific research which I will go in depth with a little more shortly. In a moment’s notice the evidence pointing in one direction can do a U-turn and start pointing elsewhere the more findings there are being discovered for a certain field of science.  Which leads me to my next point and that’s when somebody calls a certain theory in science a ‘fact.’ This entails that science has ‘proof’ of a certain scientific theory as being 100% true. Look at the definition of ‘ proof ’ to get an easy understanding of this. But we know there is no such thing as ‘scientific proof’ in scientific research. These egregiously false statements used by some individuals show their lack of un...
Read more

Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve is Poor Design Debunked

Image
So, I got into an argument with a serious evolutionist who believed that the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve in giraffes and humans is unnecessarily long and is poorly designed and so no creator would have designed it in such a way. And I just wanted to say that a lot of these false notions about the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve being evidence for poor design and therefore evidence for evolution, are the result of a lack of actual understanding of how the SLN and RLN function and its intended purpose in humans and giraffes which doesn't show evolution being a factor whatsoever in reality. The RLN doesn't just innervate the Larynx and go in a weird direction to there from the vessels of the heart. It also innervates the Esophagus and Trachea of the giraffe and so to reach its Larynx from all of these extensions at the same time, the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve needs to be, indeed, very long in the giraffe to begin with [1].  And it is indeed a necessity for its extra length in huma...
Read more