BelieveItOrNot

Muslims will try very hard to argue for any immoral cases in the Bible to make it look equally as unappealing as their Qur’an so it doesn’t fall to an inferior status. Much like a dysfunctional relationship where you’re the one who’s had enough and wants to let the other go but refuses to let go of you thinking it will still work out. That is the Qur’an to the Bible. The Qur’an wants to share the same status and appreciation as the Bible, but is still unable to rival it to that point. Unfortunately, this is yet another one of those cases where the Qur’an will fall very short of making the Bible look equally unappealing insofar that the Qur’an will look much worse in comparison. It’s the infamous claim about Rebekah’s age of marriage to Isaac which muslims will say was 3. How inaccurate and unsupported by the scriptural evidence this statement is! Here’s why… the Bible does not explicitly say the age of Rebekah when Isaac married her. I will steelman this for the muslims. Muslim arg...

     There is no explicit Biblical foundation for the Noahide laws. You will never find God saying to Noah in Genesis anywhere, "here are my 7 Noahide commandments to the gentiles." No such verse exists. It's a much later invention by rabbis in the rabbinic era to give gentiles a sense of moral code to live by, much like the golden rule but only with a few more 'golden rules' so to speak.  There are two commandments to Noah in Genesis. One is Genesis 9:4; 'don't eat the flesh of a still living animal.' This is considered a Noahide commandment. The other can be interpreted as a Noahide commandment if you do a lot of twisting and turning of the scripture to make it apply to the concept of murder; this is Genesis 9:5-6. Even so, it's still obscure inasmuch that the "shedding of man's blood" could be justified in war and self defense as two examples.  Even the Torah agrees that if you killed a thief before sunrise there is no bloodguilt u...